More detailed comparison and testing Part 2
Cylinder compatibility
Consistency of this is not bad at all, using an M120 spring with 0.43g BBs this rifle can reliably and consistently hop these heavy BBs with only 4.5/10 hop strength, using its stock bucking. Note that the gun suffers from reverse Joule creeping problems so heavier pistons would be needed.
However the air tightness of this rifle is……well let's just say there is no air tightness whatsoever to speak of. Plugging the inner barrel does nothing and no gas is being kept, and the cause of leakage is pretty much "yes". Since buckings rarely cause that severe of a leak (ML MR hop will still hold a bit of air even if they leak out really quickly) so it was assumed to be the cylinder.
Using the Maple Leaf cylinder as a control group would soon conclude that the piston is indeed a source of leakage (and as it turns out, the T10 stock cylinder body is also leaky for some reason).
Previously a prediction was made that the cylinder threads are the reason why the cylinder couldn't accept other pistons, however as it turns out it was the cylinder having excessively thick internal walls, leaving a narrower cylinder width and prevented the use of pistons like the Laylax ones directly.
While it should be possible to file down the POM glide rings, filing it down excessively (0.5mm minimum) isn't too feasible with only sand paper alone, I ended up replacing the O-ring on the stock piston instead for as a stop gap measurement. It ended up solving the sealing issue even inside a foreign cylinder.
Despite having a narrow cylinder chamber, the wall of this cylinder is so thick it's notably thicker than the Maple Leaf one. This extra thickness however doesn't cause the Maple Leaf cylinder to be incompatible with the Fieldcraft's receiver.
This extra thick wall also prevents the use of other cylinder heads (or at least those that I have in possession) and the safe bet is it's better to use the stock cylinder head. To make issues worse, it turned out that the stock cylinder head also contributes to the sealing problem and has exactly zero seal as well.
This lack of sealing is caused by the fact that 1. The O-ring is placed oddly between the cylinder wall end and the flat end of the cylinder nozzle, which provides exactly no sealing properties, and 2. The nozzle end doesn't seem to be seated tightly inside the bucking unlike other nozzles which produce a notable "relaxation" effect when the nozzle is pulled out from the hop up assembly.
Normally replacing the entire cylinder assembly with an aftermarket is the easier choice (since they function normally in this rifle despite the slightly wider receiver diameter), the stock one is of good quality and tossing it away would've been a waste.
To solve the above issues the standard way of doing so is pretty much 1. wrapping a hell ton of Teflon tape onto the cylinder head threads to keep air inside of the cylinder, and 2. Use some softer, flexible tape to wrap around the nozzle so that air is trapped more effectively.