Bore size is a challange of fps.My question was more if the extended cylinder of the v 2.5 gearbox has enough air with a bore-up kit or without to push a 0.30g bb out of a 6.23 509 orga barrel or If I should choose another barrel
Skickat från min Nexus 5 via Tapatalk
I like the IR-hops more because they are much easier to work with, and seem more durable than the standard material (not saying it isn't - it's still incredibly durable). I would recommend the Maple Leaf bucking and a standard nub. Once you gain more experience, try a few R-hop installs on old stock barrels. Wouldn't want to ruin an expensive aftermarket barrel.Is the ir-hop just as good as r-hop or have he compromised to get it to work better in colder weather?
In other words, if I put a bore-up kit in my sr25 I will have no problem with the orga Magnus 6.23 509mm barrel?Bore size is a challange of fps.
Length is a challange volume.
This is built for bore size. But my math for my sr 25 (v2.5 gearbox) puts it at just under 500mm max. Better hint shorter then longer.
theroy says, but even if you don tsee a huge fps drop, being really long also means you cant "snap shot" as wellIn other words, if I put a bore-up kit in my sr25 I will have no problem with the orga Magnus 6.23 509mm barrel?
I'm sorry for all the questions but I'm a beginner when it comes to this.
I'm choosing between orga, pdi and a promethious barrel.
Skickat från min Nexus 5 via Tapatalk
Snap shot? Maybe I should buy a shorter outer barrel and a 455mm inner barrel. Want a new outer barrel so I can get threadstheroy says, but even if you don tsee a huge fps drop, being really long also means you cant "snap shot" as well
You are right, a properly tuned spring powered BASR is one of the most CONSISTENT weapons available. But with a good regulator on a HPA or PolarStar system, they can blow away even the best spring due to sheer amount of adjustable volume being pushed behind the bb. Spring rifles are stuck with a maximum amount of volume, which is one of their only limiting factors.But you go a long way apart from the 6.05 to the 6.23, is it because the LENGTH for the .23 is usually so short in order to compensate for bigger volume?
They sell this wide bore barrel "for" VSR and L96:
Orga Magnus 6.23mm Wide Bore Barrel for VSR & L96 (200mm) ---------notice the 200mm instead of the usual 450/500mm used for the l96 for example.
Would this be a good option for an l96?
Is the .05 option present for lengths of around 500mm for SPRING powered rifles?
Sounds like the best choice would be a 500mm .23 with HPA strong enough that compensates for the length/volume part, but, is that possible? wouldnt that break the internals? if not, which are we looking at for that? ---sorry ive mainly done research for spring powered rifles, mainly the VSR and the L96, i dont know much about GAS rifles, maybe these dont suffer from the stress the spring ones do?---
IF not, should going 200mm for an l96 SPRING rifle be a better option?
Up until now i used to think the SPRING rifles were kings in regards of the accuracy+distance equation, is that no longer true? is it because of the stronger spring will break the internals and we dont have developed the correct internals yet?
Sorry, im new and trying to figure all this out, been reading a ton and the more i read the more i learn but the more confused i am liable to get too xD.
Care to explain?...This in turn significantly raises the joule output of your gun, while potentially(but not always) leaving your fps barely affected.
And why would they ever change that, if they don't know about JC?It is dangerous because a lot of clubs insist on chronoing with 0.2gm bb's...
I agree. Lack of knowledge is dangerous but it would be better to go directly to the people who run the clubs to tell them instead of telling everyone how to JC before the clubs have change their rules.And why would they ever change that, if they don't know about JC?
Or is there another reason, that they want to hold on to the old ways?
I think everyone interested in the matter will find it even if we dont talk about it, i didnt knew about it and i just started reading about all this a couple of weeks ago, i decided to create an account here even in less time, i see why you are worried, i just read the thread by Lirimacora made last year and i see the dangers, reading about this made me realize not only to not care about FPS but to pay close attention to the joules/weight issue, in that same manner we have a rule here about not discussing over 550 fps, shouldnt that be changed to joules too like we wish airsoft camps did?I agree. Lack of knowledge is dangerous but it would be better to go directly to the people who run the clubs to tell them instead of telling everyone how to JC before the clubs have change their rules.
I know by reading other threads on here that some clubs are just stuck in their ways (for one reason or another) and so it is best to not speak of it JC until people who run the clubs have better understanding and change the rules.
That is my thoughts anyway. If you wish to carry on talking about it, then feel free.