That hop up arm that I released is intended for use with standard buckings. It will probably cause pre-engagement with an Rhop. Should be very easy to edit with basic CAD, or you can just manually file it down to the shape you need.
Pre-engagement? My only issue is it orbits .4s haha, but I'm sure I'll eventually edit the file a bit.That hop up arm that I released is intended for use with standard buckings. It will probably cause pre-engagement with an Rhop. Should be very easy to edit with basic CAD, or you can just manually file it down to the shape you need.
pre-engagement as in the nub will be applying pressure into the bucking/rhop even if you dial the hop all the way off. It's probably why it's sending 0.4's into the sky. Glad the file is useful to youPre-engagement? My only issue is it orbits .4s haha, but I'm sure I'll eventually edit the file a bit.
Thanks again for making/releasing that!
Oh gotcha, never heard that term before but yeah definitely have some of that!pre-engagement as in the nub will be applying pressure into the bucking/rhop even if you dial the hop all the way off. It's probably why it's sending 0.4's into the sky. Glad the file is useful to you
I am under the impression that I didn't end up doing it for this one. I get the feeling that I tried it out but didn't see a measurable difference so it was not pursued.Oh gotcha, never heard that term before but yeah definitely have some of that!
Wanted to ask, did you angle the concave part a bit to account for the pivot of the hop arm? Damn shame someone didn't make an aftermarket hop unit with true TDC with no pivot point, although I'm not going to complain with how well it performs as is
Guess I shouldn't try to fix what isn't broken!I generally believe(also mentioned by Masada) that arms with a pivot are better than a vertical nub.
They are easier to make for sure, but are also more modular, and are easier to stabilize.
With an Airsoft Philosopher or TAC41 style nub, it can rock side to side and forwards and backwards, while an arm that is on a well fitting securely attached pivot pin will not move forward or backward. There will be side to side movement, but this can be fixed with an aftermarket arm(not a great idea unless you have an AA chamber) or with some good old shimming, be it tape, Teflon tape, or any type of filler material. This will solve side to side movement, depending on your parts or skills, and will make a rock solid setup, leaving just up and down movement that should be reasonably easy for a company to get right.
Still, for my homemade chambers I like a vertical nub because of the way I make my nubs, but this is out of laziness and I will be making an arm chamber for one of my guns to get a direct comparison between the two styles.
I used the same hop arm when I rebuilt an MSR338 that came to me non-functional. Paired it with an R-Hopped barrel, and the results have been really good. I was using .36 and getting them out to 70m+ with a 1.5J setup. Now that I know about the possible pre-engagement, I might try it without the hop screw in.That hop up arm that I released is intended for use with standard buckings. It will probably cause pre-engagement with an Rhop. Should be very easy to edit with basic CAD, or you can just manually file it down to the shape you need.
Interesting, the extra power mine has must be making the hop more effective since it orbits .4s. That or the PDI R hop has better contact potential.I used the same hop arm when I rebuilt an MSR338 that came to me non-functional. Paired it with an R-Hopped barrel, and the results have been really good. I was using .36 and getting them out to 70m+ with a 1.5J setup. Now that I know about the possible pre-engagement, I might try it without the hop screw in.
LOL! that is funny, surprised the name wasn’t taken tbh. And thanks! I love it tbhHuh, I joined one month before you, now I'm wondering if I didn't make my name ghost 😮💨, but on topic, that's gotta be one of the coolest-looking snipers I've seen!