Piston travel is linear, not parabolic.
The L85/L86 19 tooth system in question, is the G&G replica (to the very least). I don’t remember if any other manufacturer uses a 19 or 15 tooth setup; pretty sure the ICS replica is a 15 tooth, but I may be mistaken.
I meant to say acceleration was parabolic. I have seen a piston before.
I belive that g&g and army l85 is 19 tooths. However there is some issues with both. Something about piston stripping if run with a good battery.
I was hoping you were meaning acceleration, but I have heard some really out there thought beforeI meant to say acceleration was parabolic. I have seen a piston before.
I didn’t disagree with you. I was speaking about air pressure at the hop rubber, not at the end of the piston’s travel. Initial acceleration is what I was referring to:
I agree with LEO, a 15 tooth gearbox can be used to reach 2.8J, the issue is that the 15 tooth setups a noticeable percentage less air volume than a 19 tooth setup, so the 15 tooth system has to work that much harder, have that much more spring rate, have that much of a stronger motor, that much more stress on itself.
I was hoping you were meaning acceleration, but I have heard some really out there thought before
The one thing to keep in mind, as far as a typical V2 setup and a 2.5 SR25/M110/AR10, is that the nozzle of a V2.5 is 24.00mm long, almost 3mm longer than the typical M4/M16’s nozzle.The extra length allows for longer travel to the hopup bucking, so the parabolic increase in piston speed, longer nozzle, and heavy BB has more of an opportunity to have the needed increase of pressure to match and possible exceed the pressure spike of a V2, with a 21.00-21.25mm nozzle.
Have I pressure tested the two, and compared? No, but if there wasn’t a notable performance benefit increase, as seen by the manufacturers, I am pretty sure that they would have gone with a V2, with a bore up setup, and a longer hopup system that let the into barrel sit a little further back into the hopup, to have the same length of travel for it, as the M16/M4’s do.
Does that make sense?
It does not use half teeth, and begadi gears, didnt know about them. Nothing really special about them though, still roughly the same torque, just has a galvanic nickel plating on them. "CNC machined" does not mean much from carbon steel gears.
The “Extended Cylinder” V2 SR25s are sold by Golden Eagle/JG/Echo1/Matrix. I think that heard that Avengers brand does but never heard of anyone actually owning one of those.
Never bother to learn the technical difference between the V2.5 and the V2L… to me they’re both just “that long sucker over there”.
I’ll be honest, I can’t hear an
I got nothing…. I also have some hearing damage from ‘splosions and boomie things, and working 20 years near air tools, perhaps the sound you want me to hear is in a deaf spot for me.
It’s hard to catch—I’m lucky my ears are still young. Give me a few years to catch up.
Easiest way to look at the technical difference between the two, the V2.5 makes complete sense for a DMR platform, and was likely designed by a person that enjoys airsoft, and their job; the V2L makes no sense, and was designed by someone that not only hated airsoft and their job, they were an exiled KelTec engineer, that instead of getting a model train full of cocaine to make it through hardcore design sessions, was given acid, with an embalming fluid chaser.
You could call it age, you could call it that you lacked the propensity to make career choices that were likely to do permanent harm to yourself; either choice is likely correct 😁It’s hard to catch—I’m lucky my ears are still young. Give me a few years to catch up.
